This site is not maintained. Click here for the new website of Richard Dawkins.

The battle of the butterflies and the ants

Thanks to Norm at http://onegoodmove.org for the link.

Reposted from:
http://www.nature.com/news/2008/080103/full/news.2007.405.html

ant and caterpillarParasitic caterpillars show local evolution as never before.

Butterflies that trick ants into helping to raise their young are driving an evolutionary arms race between the two species, researchers have found. The discovery is important to the conservation of rare Alcon blue butterfies, they say.

Maculinea alcon butterflies infect the nests of Myrmica ants by hatching caterpillars nearby, hoping that the caterpillars will be 'adopted' and cared for by ants that mistake them for their own young. The caterpillars achieve this by mimicking the surface chemistry of the ants. Getting this chemistry right is important: if an ant doesn't recognize a caterpillar as one of its own it will eat it, says David Nash, a zoologist at the University of Copenhagen in Denmark.

Successfully adopted caterpillars are bad for the ant colonies, as ants may neglect their own young in favour of the intruders. But the ants are fighting back. "The ant larvae seem to be evolving as a result of being parasitized," says Nash. "It's an ongoing evolutionary arms race."

Intruder alert! Intruder alert!

Nash and his colleagues tracked the ongoing fight at several sites in Denmark, where caterpillars infiltrate the nests of two types of ants: Myrmica rubra and Myrmica ruginodis . They looked at sites where caterpillars were present and ones where they were absent.

M. ruginodis are genetically very similar to each other between populations, the researchers report in Science , and had similar chemical profiles across different populations1. This lack of diversity means that adaptation is difficult: they were relatively consistently susceptible to caterpillar infection, at rates of 8-40%.

But M. rubra , the researchers found, had different pockets of colonies with different genetics and different chemical profiles. And there was much more diversity in chemical profiles between colonies that had to deal with the caterpillars than there was outside the area of caterpillar infestation, implying that these colonies were adapting to the presence of the pest.

This broad diversity results in a range of susceptibility to caterpillar infection. Infection rates varied widely between 0 and 72% in these ant colonies.

And the butterflies are in turn adapting to the different ants. The more ants there are with a specific chemical profile, the more heavily they were infected, showing that the butterflies had adapted to take advantage of the prevalent ants.

Running to stay still

This is a perfect example of a co-evolution between two species, says Jeremy Thomas, a zoologist at the University of Oxford and the Natural Environment Research Council's Centre for Ecology and Hydrology.

"The study provides a really good and clear cut empirical example of an exciting area of theory," says Thomas. "Local co-evolution has become a really major area of ecology in the last decade. There's a lot of theory on this but there are very few practical examples," he says.

Co-evolutionary battles such as these are examples of what US biologist Leigh Van Valen named Red Queen Theory2, after the eponymous character in Lewis Carroll's children's novel Through the Looking Glass . In this book, the Red Queen tells Alice (of Wonderland fame): "Now, here, you see, it takes all the running you can do, to keep in the same place." In evolutionary terms: if the butterflies want to stay where they are, living the high life at the ants' expense, they need to race one step ahead of the evolving ant defences.

Conservation consequences

Local adaptation such as this has serious implications for the conservation of the butterflies, the researchers say.

If a butterfly has evolved to specifically invade the nest of a local ant, it may be chemically different enough to be recognized as a fake by the slightly different ants in other areas.

Although the large blue butterfly was successfully reintroduced to the United Kingdom in the 1980s, other reintroductions have failed. It may be that in those cases the ants saw through the disguise, and the would-be nest hijackers instead became dinner.

References
Nash, D. R. et al. Science 319, 88-90 (2008).
Lythgoe, K. & Read, A. F. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13, 473-474 (1998).

TAGGED: BIOLOGY, EVOLUTION


RELATED CONTENT

Bonobo makes stone tools like early...

Hannah Krakauer - New Scientist Comments

Kanzi the bonobo is able to create and use stone tools

Scientists Discover Previously Unknown...

- - URMC Comments

Newer Imaging Technique Brings ‘Glymphatic System’ to Light

Grey parrots use reasoning where...

- - The Royal Society Comments

Research suggesting that grey parrots can reason about cause and effect from audio cues alone- a skill that monkeys and dogs lack- is presented in Proceedings of the Royal Society B today.

Why do organisms build tissues they...

- - Science Blog Comments

Why, after millions of years of evolution, do organisms build structures that seemingly serve no purpose?

New flat-faced human species possibly...

Charles Choi - CBS News Comments

Four decades ago, in 1972, the Koobi Fora Research Project discovered the enigmatic fossilized skull known as KNM-ER 1470 which ignited a now long-standing debate about how many different species of early Homos existed.

A New Species Discovered ... On Flickr

Adam Cole - NPR Comments

One day in May of 2011, Shaun Winterton was looking at pictures of bugs on the Internet when something unusual caught his eye. It was a close shot of a green lacewing — an insect he knew well — but on its wing was an unfamiliar network of black lines and a few flecks of blue.

MORE

MORE BY NATURE.COM, DANIEL CRESSEY

MORE

Comments

Comment RSS Feed

Please sign in or register to comment