This site is not maintained. Click here for the new website of Richard Dawkins.

Broken symmetry: Answering the solace of quantum

Thanks to SPS for the link.

http://www.physorg.com/news142605505.html

Broken symmetry: Answering the solace of quantum

NASA file photo of a star formation. Humans like the comfort of symmetry -- the identical image in the mirror, the matching wings of the baroque mansion, the equal numbers in opposing football teams.

Humans like the comfort of symmetry -- the identical image in the mirror, the matching wings of the baroque mansion, the equal numbers in opposing football teams.

So it comes as a bit of a shocker when physicists say the Universe is built on broken symmetry.

Creation was not a soothing, balanced event, they say. It was, essentially, a lopsided affair.

Had things been symmetrical in the Big Bang 13.7 billion years ago, equal amounts of matter and antimatter should have been formed, rather like the hole you dig in the ground is equal to the mound of earth that comes from the hole.

The problem is that matter and antimatter are deadly rivals.

When a matter particle collides with its opposite-charged foe, the two annihilate each other in a puff of energy. To use the image of the hole, the mound will fill the hole you have dug.

But something happened in the seething soup of primal particles in the instant after the Bang. Matter gained the upper hand over antimatter.

Thanks to this excess of matter, we have the galaxies, the stars, Earth and all the life on it. Without this mysterious victory, we wouldn't be here.

How to explain the enigma lies at the heart of work that earned two Japanese and an American the 2008 Nobel Physics Prize on Tuesday.

Their achievement, in exploring the violation of symmetry, strengthened and widened the conceptual model of fundamental particles and forces, the Nobel Prize committee said.

"Every particle of matter has an opposite number, the antimatter particle," Etienne Auge, deputy director of the National Institute of Nuclear Physics and Particle Physics (IN2P3), told AFP.

"What is strange, though, is that we are living in a world that consists almost entirely of matter."

Yoichiro Nambu of the United States earned half of the award for theories developed in the 1960s about "spontaneous symmetry breaking."

This underpins the notion that shortly as the Universe started to cool after the Big Bang, a single superforce ripped apart and formed three of the four known forces of nature today.

These are the strong force, the weak force and the electromagnetic force, which act, through messenger particles, on the bestiary of indivisible particles that make up matter.

The other two laureates, Makoto Kobayashi and Toshihide Maskawa of Japan, showed that in certain conditions, antimatter does not obey the same rules as matter.

Spotting the anomaly "is a bit like holding up a book and looking in a mirror, and then realising that instead of seeing reverse writing, you see proper writing," said Philip Diamond of Britain's Institute of Physics.

This symmetry break could only be explained by the presence of three families of particles known as quarks, Kobayashi and Maskawa suggested. Nearly three years later, their hunch was confirmed in experiments.

Two big things are still missing from the Standard Model, the conceptual vehicle of particle physics today.

One is an explanation as to how particles acquire mass, and the other is an explanation for the force of gravity.

The leading contender for mass is the Higgs Boson, proposed as a ubiquitous, syrupy field that interacts with other particles.

The "Higgs" is famously being hunted at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), the massive particle smasher that was unveiled in Geneva last month.

As for gravity, one idea is that there is a particle called a graviton which conveys the force.

What causes gravity "poses a colossal challenge for physicists today," the Nobel committee said on Tuesday.


TAGGED: PHYSICS, SPACE


RELATED CONTENT

Why Some Physicists Bet Against the...

Robert Wright - The Atlantic Comments

Hawking wasn't available to answer that question, but I did manage to have a long conversation with an American physicist who had also doubted the existence of the Higgs--Lawrence Krauss

A Blip That Speaks of Our Place in the...

Lawrence M. Krauss - New York Times Comments

A Blip That Speaks of Our Place in the Universe

How the Higgs Boson Posits a New Story...

Lawrence M. Krauss - The Daily Beast Comments

How the Higgs Boson Posits a New Story of our Creation

An idea thought up on a rainy weekend

Johnathan Brown - The Independent Comments

As an atheist with no desire to upset believers, Professor Peter Higgs has always hated the idea of a God particle. He has never been keen on the nomenclature of the Higgs boson either – referring to it as "the particle named after me" on the rare occasions he gives an interview.

"It's a boson:" Higgs quest bears new...

Chris Wickham - Reuters 0 Comments

(Reuters) - Scientists at Europe's CERN research centre have found a new subatomic particle, a basic building block of the universe, which appears to be the boson imagined and named half a century ago by theoretical physicist Peter Higgs.

A Quantum Leap

Lawrence Krauss - Slate Comments

MORE

Comments

Comment RSS Feed

Please sign in or register to comment