This site is not maintained. Click here for the new website of Richard Dawkins.

Jesus and the torture debate

Thanks to David for the link.
Reposted from
http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2009/04/jesus_and_torture.cfm

blankOVER at Beliefnet, Steven Waldman wonders why John Ashcroft, the former attorney general and a devout Christian, never made a moral argument against torture. "We have no reports of him airing the Christian case against torture", says Mr Waldman, assuming that Mr Ashcroft made a "utilitarian calculation" in acquiescing to the policy. He bemoans the fact that "what Ashcroft never did, apparently, was ask: What Would Jesus Do?"

Thank god for that. Unlike Mr Waldman, I'm not comfortable with our attorney general basing his official actions on the hypothetical leanings of Jesus Christ. Sure, there was a Christian argument to be made against torture, but the nation's top law-enforcement official had a much more solid basis on which to mount any opposition: the law. What Mr Ashcroft never did, apparently, was ask: What would a law-abiding administration do? In his position, that should've trumped any wisdom he derived from Jesus's example.

Mr Waldman goes on to ask, "What is the value of having a religious person in office" if they're not going to bring their religious beliefs into the decision-making process? Religion is often the basis for a person's morality, but the tone of Mr Waldman's column grates on my nerves. Many people sat in on the administration's discussions about torture. There was no greater burden on Mr Ashcroft, as a devout Christian, to present the moral argument against this policy than there was on anyone else in the room. To suggest as much is to wrongfully assume that devout Christians have superior morals to people who are less religious-minded.

TAGGED: ABUSE, MORALITY, RELIGION


RELATED CONTENT

It's What Moral Philosophers Do

Richard Dawkins - RichardDawkins.net Comments

It's What Moral Philosophers Do

Moral Clarity and Richard Dawkins

Carson - Reasons for God 264 Comments

What kind of meta-ethical foundation has Dawkins provided for his ‘moral home’?

The Moral Necessity of a Godless...

Tauriq Moosa - big think 78 Comments

The Moral Necessity of a Godless Existence

UPDATED: Why I want all our children to...

Richard Dawkins - The Observer 197 Comments

Whatever else the Bible might be – and it really is a great work of literature – it is not a moral book and young people need to learn that important fact because they are very frequently told the opposite.

Who matters (or should) when scientists...

Janet D. Stemwedel - Scientific... 7 Comments

Who matters (or should) when scientists engage in ethical decision-making?

Bioethicist Richard Dawkins: Morality,...

Sean DeButts - BellevuePatch 36 Comments

Bioethicist Richard Dawkins: Morality, Society Can Be "Intelligently Designed"

MORE

MORE BY ECONOMIST.COM

Believe it or not

Economist.com 45 Comments

The meaning of freedom

Economist.com 16 Comments

MORE

Comments

Comment RSS Feed

Please sign in or register to comment