Simon Singh and Free Speech - Against the BCA Libel Claim
By FACEBOOK GROUP
Added: Sat, 16 May 2009 23:00:00 UTC
Simon Singh, the highly respected science writer (Fermat's Last Theorem, etc), is being sued for libel by the British Chiropractic Association.
(Chiropractic is an alternative/complementary therapy which purports to treat various ailments by manipulation of the spine.)
The BCA are promoting Chiropractic as treatment for children with (potentially serious) ailments such as asthma and frequent ear infections.
Simon Singh criticised this in a Guardian "comment" piece. In particular, he criticised the BCA for doing this without appropriate clinical evidence.
He is now being sued for libel.
The BCA want damages and an injunction against him saying such things in future.
Fundamentally this is about free speech and the use of evidence.
An informed and responsible science writer should be able to write about genuine concerns on an important public health issue (the correct treatment for children) without the threat and expense of High Court libel claims.
Even if he was wrong, it would surely be enough for the BCA to simply show their supporting evidence. But they are suing him instead.
In the words of Frank Frizelle: "Letâs hear your evidence, not your legal muscle."
Message from Simon Singh!
For legal reasons, I am very limited in what I can say at the moment, but I hope to be back in touch soon.
In the meantime, I would like to take this chance to say thanks to everyone who has joined this group - your support is much appreciated and your postings are a real morale booster.
Bye for now.
A primer on English libel law:
Read more at the facebook group page:
Jack of Kentâs blog is well informed and written from an expertâs point of view. Recent update postings include:
Googling words such as SIMON SINGH, BCA, LIBEL will take you to lots of blogs and articles about the libel case. Google news is particularly helpful (search âSIMON SINGHâ, and you can also then click on the blog option.
Peter Singer - The Scotsman Comments
Analysis: Why it’s irrational to risk women’s lives for the sake of the unborn
Ruth Williams - TheScientist Comments
Double helix showing coplanar alignment of standard base pairs.
CLAUDIA DREIFUS - New York Times 15 Comments
Carson C. Chow deploys mathematics to solve the everyday problems of real life. As an investigator at the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, he tries to figure out why 1 in 3 Americans are obese.
- - MedicalXpress 27 Comments
Cocaine decreases activity of a protein necessary for normal functioning of the brain's reward system
Christopher Badcock, Ph.D -... 3 Comments
Neurons Mirror the Diametric Mind
Schizophrenics amplify neuronal mirroring, autistics reduce it
- - MedicalXpress 11 Comments
How thinking about death can lead to a good life
Thinking about death can actually be a good thing. An awareness of mortality can improve physical health and help us re-prioritize our goals and values, according to a new analysis of recent scientific studies. Even non-conscious thinking about death – say walking by a cemetery – could prompt positive changes and promote helping others.