This site is not maintained. Click here for the new website of Richard Dawkins.

Who needs theology?

http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/local/Who-needs-theology--Full-submissions-from-theologians-59867962.html

Who needs theology? That was the question raised last month by Bob Russell in a letter to the editor of the Free Press. In it he quoted well-known atheist Richard Dawkins, who asked: "What has theology ever said that is of the smallest use to anybody?"

Theologians, Dawkins went on to say, "don't do anything, don't affect anything, don't mean anything. What makes anyone think that ‘theology’ is a subject at all?"

Russell’s letter elicited a few replies, but none were from theologians, as far as I could tell. So I thought I would ask a few to respond. Excerpts from their submissions were carried in my Sept. 20 column on the Faith Page; here are their full replies.

Jamie Howison, pastor of St. Bendedict’s Table in Winnipeg

"The article of July 19, ‘U of M helps keep religious studies students here,’ generated a little flurry of letters, each of which in different ways raised questions regarding the point of the whole theological enterprise. Bob Russell’s letter of August 21 quoted Richard Dawkins as some length, which rather neatly summarizes what lies at the heart of the question of who needs theology—of why theology might matter.

"If one follows the reasoning of Dawkins and of the other currently fashionable roster of new atheists (Christopher Hitchens, Sam Harris, Philip Pullman, et al), the theological enterprise is absurd. Etymologically, ‘theology’ is God-talk or words (logos) about God (theos), yet if God’s existence is not rationally necessary, much less demonstrable, what is the point? According to these thinkers, when it comes to God not only is there a lack of good hard data, but there is also a sordid history of all manner of evil perpetrated by the church in the name of this God.
...
Continue reading
http://www.winnipegfreepress.com/local/Who-needs-theology--Full-submissions-from-theologians-59867962.html

TAGGED: COMMENTARY, RELIGION


RELATED CONTENT

Science journalism through the looking...

Chris Chambers and Petroc Sumner -... Comments

Science has an uneasy relationship with journalism, so what can be done by both sides to improve coverage

In defence of obscure words

Will Self - BBC News Magazine 100 Comments

We chase "fast culture" at our peril - unusual words and difficult art are good for us, says Will Self.

Your Brain on Fiction

Annie Murphy Paul - New York Times 26 Comments

New support for the value of fiction is arriving from an unexpected quarter: neuroscience.

The spectre of militant secularism

Nick Cohen - The Spectator 40 Comments

If you turn on the news tonight and hear of a bomber slaughtering civilians anywhere from Nigeria to the London Underground, I can reassure you of one point: the bombers will not be readers of Richard Dawkins.

A brutal price still paid for daring to...

Amol Rajan - The Independent 39 Comments

Their assault illustrates the extent to which defenders of religion still dominate our press, the brutal retaliation exacted on clever opponents of faith and the incorrigible stupidity of Sayeeda Warsi's claim about "militant secularism" last week.

The Sins of the Fathers [Also in Polish]

Richard Dawkins - RichardDawkins.net 341 Comments

I can’t help wondering at the quality of journalism which sees a scoop in attacking a man for what his five-greats grandfather did.

MORE

MORE BY STAFF WRITER

MORE

Comments

Comment RSS Feed

Please sign in or register to comment