This site is not maintained. Click here for the new website of Richard Dawkins.

Dawkins et al bring us into disrepute

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/belief/2009/nov/02/atheism-dawkins-ruse

As a professional philosopher my first question naturally is: "What or who is an atheist?" If you mean someone who absolutely and utterly does not believe there is any God or meaning then I doubt there are many in this group. Richard Dawkins denies being such a person. If you mean someone who agrees that logically there could be a god, but who doesn't think that the logical possibility is terribly likely, or at least not something that should keep us awake at night, then I guess a lot of us are atheists. But there is certainly a split, a schism, in our ranks. I am not whining (in fact I am rather proud) when I point out that a rather loud group of my fellow atheists, generally today known as the "new atheists", loathe and detest my thinking. Richard Dawkins has likened me to the pusillanimous appeaser at Munich, Neville Chamberlain. Jerry Coyne, author of Why Evolution is True, says (echoing Orwell) that only someone with pretensions to the intelligentsia could believe the silly things I believe. And energetic blogger PZ Myers refers to me as a "clueless gobshite" because I confessed to seeing why true believers might find the Kentucky Creationist Museum convincing. I will spare you what my fellow philosopher Dan Dennett has to say about me.

There are several reasons why we atheists are squabbling – I will speak only for myself but I doubt I am atypical. First, non-believer though I may be, I do not think (as do the new atheists) that all religion is necessarily evil and corrupting. This claim is on a par with golden plates in upstate New York. The Quakers and the Evangelicals were inspired and driven by their religion to oppose slavery, and a good thing too. Of course there has been evil in the name of religion – the pope telling Africans not to use condoms in the face of Aids – but as often as not religion is not the only or even the primary force for evil. The troubles in Northern Ireland were surely about socio-economic issues also, and the young men who flew into the World Trade Centre towers were infected by the alienation and despair of the young in Muslim countries in the face of poverty and inequalities.
...
Continue reading
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/belief/2009/nov/02/atheism-dawkins-ruse
_______________________________________________________________
[UPDATE] PZ and Jerry Coyne post comments on this as well

Schisms, rifts, and apologia for insanity
http://scienceblogs.com/pharyngula/2009/11/schisms_rifts_and_apologia_for.php

Ruse gibbers on...
http://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com/2009/11/02/ruse-gibbers-on/

TAGGED: ATHEISM, COMMENTARY


RELATED CONTENT

Science journalism through the looking...

Chris Chambers and Petroc Sumner -... Comments

Science has an uneasy relationship with journalism, so what can be done by both sides to improve coverage

In defence of obscure words

Will Self - BBC News Magazine 100 Comments

We chase "fast culture" at our peril - unusual words and difficult art are good for us, says Will Self.

Your Brain on Fiction

Annie Murphy Paul - New York Times 26 Comments

New support for the value of fiction is arriving from an unexpected quarter: neuroscience.

The spectre of militant secularism

Nick Cohen - The Spectator 40 Comments

If you turn on the news tonight and hear of a bomber slaughtering civilians anywhere from Nigeria to the London Underground, I can reassure you of one point: the bombers will not be readers of Richard Dawkins.

A brutal price still paid for daring to...

Amol Rajan - The Independent 39 Comments

Their assault illustrates the extent to which defenders of religion still dominate our press, the brutal retaliation exacted on clever opponents of faith and the incorrigible stupidity of Sayeeda Warsi's claim about "militant secularism" last week.

The Sins of the Fathers [Also in Polish]

Richard Dawkins - RichardDawkins.net 341 Comments

I can’t help wondering at the quality of journalism which sees a scoop in attacking a man for what his five-greats grandfather did.

MORE

MORE BY MICHAEL RUSE

Alvin Plantinga and Intelligent Design

Michael Ruse - The Chronicle of... 78 Comments

Prayer, menstruation and the Toronto...

Michael Ruse - Chronicle of Higher... 78 Comments

The Catholic Church: Why Richard...

Michael Ruse - The Huffington Post 39 Comments

Origin of the specious

Michael Ruse - boston.com 58 Comments

Endless forms most beautiful, indeed!

Michael Ruse - John Barber - The... 9 Comments

Why I Think the New Atheists are a...

Michael Ruse - beliefnet 585 Comments

MORE

Comments

Comment RSS Feed

Please sign in or register to comment