This site is not maintained. Click here for the new website of Richard Dawkins.

Darwinopterus v Dawkins

Note that the review starts on one website and ends on another. Comments are on the link to the first half of the article. Also the main site http://talk.thinkingmatters.org.nz/ makes for some interesting browsing.
http://talk.thinkingmatters.org.nz/2009/darwinopterus-v-dawkins/

Prominent antitheist and self-styled “atheist” Richard Dawkins has written a new book, The Greatest Show on Earth: The Evidence for Evolution. Ironically, he admits about all his previous pro-evolution books:

“Looking back on these books, I realized that the evidence for evolution is nowhere explicitly set out, and that it seemed like a good gap to close.”

Naturally, CMI is preparing a book to answer Dawkins’ latest. In a chapter about alleged bad design, Dawkins had a section about the loss of wings and evolution of features like halteres, the little drumstick-like stabilizers behind the one pair of wings on flies.

To set the stage, Dawkins related the theory of English evolutionist (and former debate partner1) John Maynard Smith (1920–2004) about the evolution of flying creatures. Maynard-Smith argued that flying creatures evolved first with high stability and low maneuverability (e.g. with the long pterosaur tail or an insect’s long abdomen). Then they shortened, which caused lower stability but greater maneuverability, and they evolved advanced sensory equipment to stabilize by fast reactions (e.g. larger semicircular canals in pterosaurs or halteres in flies).

Even when Dawkins wrote, there were already dragonflies in the ointment, so to speak, because they have both long bodies (stability) but are also highly maneuverable and have advanced navigation systems. Furthermore, even known pterosaur types didn’t fit this theory, as Dawkins admitted in passing. But after writing our response to this Dawkins “Just-so” story, this new pterosaur turned up, and it adds a final demolition point. This new pterosaur, which to be fair Dawkins could not have known about when he wrote, has the stability of the long tail as well as the advanced correction features before loss of stability supposedly drove the selection for the advanced flying skills.

As a sneak peek, to show that we are indeed rebutting Dawkins’ claims, here is a draft section from our forthcoming book answering The Greatest Show on Earth:
...
Continue reading
http://creation.com/richard-dawkins-v-darwinopterus

TAGGED: -, BOOKS, RICHARD DAWKINS


RELATED CONTENT

A few Catholics still insist Galileo...

Manya A. Brachear - Chicago Tribune 122 Comments

A few conservative Roman Catholics are pointing to a dozen Bible verses and the church's original teachings as proof that Earth is the center of the universe

Mormon Glenn Beck: Hurricane Irene and...

Elizabeth Tenety - Washington Post -... 86 Comments

Loving Christians respond to atheists

William Hamby - examiner.com 113 Comments

Prince Charles branded a 'snake oil...

Ian Sample - guardian.co.uk 50 Comments

UPDATE: FALSE STORY Jerusalem rabbis...

BBC - BBC News website 154 Comments

A Jewish rabbinical court condemned to death by stoning a stray dog it feared was the reincarnation of a lawyer who insulted its judges, reports say.

MORE

MORE BY JONATHAN SARFATI

MORE

Comments

Comment RSS Feed

Please sign in or register to comment