Denham's misplaced 'faith group' faith
By AC GRAYLING - GUARDIAN.CO.UK
Added: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 00:00:00 UTC
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/nov/16/john-denham-faith-groups
John Denham, our government's minister for communities, is going to have an advisory body made up of representatives of "faith" groups, further eroding the de facto secularism that has kept our society relatively stable and collegial, at least until recently. He pours scorn on secularists, which means the majority of the population who, whatever their faith or lack of it, are secularist in the sense that they do not wish religion, still less any one particular religion, to be in the driving seat of policymaking in this country.
Apart from the fact that the "faith groups" represent less than 10% of the population – namely, the less-than-10% who go to church, mosque, temple or synagogue regularly each week, and therefore represent no one but themselves and a tiny minority – what does Denham think he is going to learn from them? Are their points of view not extremely well-known and entirely predictable?
Evidently, Denham does not know enough about this. Let us therefore ask him a few questions about what he expects to hear from the faith groups on such matters as community cohesion, discrimination, the rule of law, the treatment of gay people, the rights of women – on all of which, of course, the faith groups have spectacularly marvellous attitudes calculated to maximise peace and inclusion across society.
So, Mr Denham, on community cohesion: do you take into account the fact that the major faiths officially blaspheme one another? For Christians, Muslims are followers of false prophets, and for Muslims, Christians repudiate the teachings of the Prophet. They once went to war with one another repeatedly and bloodily for centuries over these differences. Now – for the time being – they sit at the government's table side by side, their hands eagerly stretched out for our tax money for their faith-based schools and their "community initiatives".
...
Continue reading
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/nov/16/john-denham-faith-groups
Tweet
RELATED CONTENT
Science journalism through the looking...
Chris Chambers and Petroc Sumner -... Comments
Science has an uneasy relationship with journalism, so what can be done by both sides to improve coverage
Will Self - BBC News Magazine 100 Comments
We chase "fast culture" at our peril - unusual words and difficult art are good for us, says Will Self.
Annie Murphy Paul - New York Times 26 Comments
New support for the value of fiction is arriving from an unexpected quarter: neuroscience.
The spectre of militant secularism
Nick Cohen - The Spectator 40 Comments
If you turn on the news tonight and hear of a bomber slaughtering civilians anywhere from Nigeria to the London Underground, I can reassure you of one point: the bombers will not be readers of Richard Dawkins.
A brutal price still paid for daring to...
Amol Rajan - The Independent 39 Comments
Their assault illustrates the extent to which defenders of religion still dominate our press, the brutal retaliation exacted on clever opponents of faith and the incorrigible stupidity of Sayeeda Warsi's claim about "militant secularism" last week.
The Sins of the Fathers [Also in Polish]
Richard Dawkins - RichardDawkins.net 341 Comments
I can’t help wondering at the quality of journalism which sees a scoop in attacking a man for what his five-greats grandfather did.
MORE BY AC GRAYLING
Book Review: On Evil by Terry Eagleton
AC Grayling - New Humanist 13 Comments
A religious but not righteous Judge:...
AC Grayling - Specially written for... 220 Comments
A C Grayling: Why no Asbo for the Pope?
AC Grayling - The Independent 42 Comments
Essay of the week: The New Puritanism
AC Grayling - hearldscotland 187 Comments
AC Grayling: Derren Brown's Lotto...
AC Grayling - The Belfast Telegraph 82 Comments
By their works shall ye know them
AC Grayling - guardian.co.uk 28 Comments



















Comments
Comment RSS Feed
Please sign in or register to comment
View Comments Page