This site is not maintained. Click here for the new website of Richard Dawkins.

Atheism as extremism

Thanks to Crapsquire for the link.
http://www.spectator.co.uk/faithbased/5729128/atheism-as-extremism.thtml

Watching Channel Four’s “Bible: A History”, I expected the usual cliched “look at these strange religious people” spiel – especially as it started depicting Christians with a scene from an American evangelical church. Then to Israel, where Jews were depicted by the ultra-orthodox praying against the wailing wall. To represent something by depicting its extreme form is a basic act of the journalistic stitch-up. I was all for switching it off - if my father-in-law hadn’t persisted. It quickly became more nuanced, and then Howard Jacobson (the narrator) had this to say about Richard Dawkins. It seemed to come from the heart, and is worth repeating here:-

“I don’t practise any religion nor worship any God, and fear all fanaticism and that’s bred by faith so I ought really to be sympathetic to Dawkins’ book ‘The God Delusion’. But it moves me – to be frank – to fury. Partly because it assumes that men were stupid until science rescued them. Partly because its ignorance sees no reason not to remain ignorant of what belief is like for those who do believe. Partly because of its certainty, Where’s the point of attacking religion for thinking it has all the answers, when you think you have all the answers yourself? Blind faith is fatuous, but so is blind doubt. This is where I find myself: unable to share the faith of the religious, but unable to share the mockery of the atheists. The big question for me is how to believe, and not to believe, at the same time. Let’s confront the absolutists: those who absolutely believe and those who absolutely don’t.”


Of course, most Christians and Jews do not think the Bible is a fax from God and regard it as a mixture of eternal truths and some time-bound elements that we can ignore. So most are stuck in the middle with Jacobson. But it’s unusual to see aggressive atheism – ie, the type which seeks to mock people with religion – depicted as form of extremism.

Rageh Omaar does Islam next Friday at 7pm. I might even watch it.

TAGGED: COMMENTARY, RELIGION, RICHARD DAWKINS


RELATED CONTENT

Science journalism through the looking...

Chris Chambers and Petroc Sumner -... Comments

Science has an uneasy relationship with journalism, so what can be done by both sides to improve coverage

In defence of obscure words

Will Self - BBC News Magazine 100 Comments

We chase "fast culture" at our peril - unusual words and difficult art are good for us, says Will Self.

Your Brain on Fiction

Annie Murphy Paul - New York Times 26 Comments

New support for the value of fiction is arriving from an unexpected quarter: neuroscience.

The spectre of militant secularism

Nick Cohen - The Spectator 40 Comments

If you turn on the news tonight and hear of a bomber slaughtering civilians anywhere from Nigeria to the London Underground, I can reassure you of one point: the bombers will not be readers of Richard Dawkins.

A brutal price still paid for daring to...

Amol Rajan - The Independent 39 Comments

Their assault illustrates the extent to which defenders of religion still dominate our press, the brutal retaliation exacted on clever opponents of faith and the incorrigible stupidity of Sayeeda Warsi's claim about "militant secularism" last week.

The Sins of the Fathers [Also in Polish]

Richard Dawkins - RichardDawkins.net 341 Comments

I can’t help wondering at the quality of journalism which sees a scoop in attacking a man for what his five-greats grandfather did.

MORE

MORE BY FRASER NELSON

MORE

Comments

Comment RSS Feed

Please sign in or register to comment