This site is not maintained. Click here for the new website of Richard Dawkins.

← Fossils may be 'earliest animals'

Fossils may be 'earliest animals' - Comments

cheesedoff17's Avatar Comment 1 by cheesedoff17

Who's betting who's right?

Thu, 19 Aug 2010 09:26:33 UTC | #502301

-TheCodeCrack-'s Avatar Comment 2 by -TheCodeCrack-

What will this mean for the 'Cambrian explosion'?

Thu, 19 Aug 2010 10:17:05 UTC | #502320

emilem's Avatar Comment 3 by emilem

I am busy tweeting the whole of the Origin of Species. Please follow it at

Thu, 19 Aug 2010 10:46:03 UTC | #502344

bluebird's Avatar Comment 4 by bluebird

circles, anvils, wishbones and rings

Just add mini marshmallows for a cool breakfast cereal :P

I'd love to see science themed cereals on store shelves.

Thu, 19 Aug 2010 16:28:30 UTC | #502502

TIKI AL's Avatar Comment 5 by TIKI AL

So this is why Lindsey Lohan has the ability to soak up booze like a sponge. Her lawyer will use this.

"I'd love to see science themed cereals on store shelves." (bluebird @ 4.) ...So would I, but the godbots would ban or boycott them.

Thu, 19 Aug 2010 18:17:52 UTC | #502562

helena!'s Avatar Comment 6 by helena!

That's quite the idea you have there emilem.

Thu, 19 Aug 2010 18:28:01 UTC | #502567

helena!'s Avatar Comment 7 by helena!

Ever since I read TGSOE I find myself staring at rocks looking for fossils or markings. I now have a new profound respect for rocks. I am serious they are fascinating. If I find a small stray stone I take it home. Science opens your eyes wide.

Thu, 19 Aug 2010 18:30:37 UTC | #502570

rsm_aus's Avatar Comment 8 by rsm_aus

Being South Australian, I'm not at all surprised that this didn't make the local news let alone national. Rather we're stuck with the usual paedophile politicians and pregnant celebrities. Pity such a fascinating find should go ignored.

Fri, 20 Aug 2010 11:24:38 UTC | #502869