Natural Selection vs. Opportunity in Macroevolutionary Patterning of the Fossil Record
By GREG LADEN - GREG LADEN'S BLOG CULTURE AS SCIENCE ~ SCIENCE AS CULTURE
Added: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 14:44:45 UTC
I'm going to talk about one or two peer reviewed papers, but in doing so, I'm going to have to say a few words ... and this will not be pretty ... about a certain science writer's report at the BBC.
In an article titled "Space is the final frontier for evolution, study claims" BBC "science writer" Howard Falcon-Lang uses the old, tired, and quite frankly, stupendously unethical tack of making a claim that Darwin has been overthrown by new research. If someone actually overthrows Darwin, then so be it. But this is not what has happened. Falcon-Lang, or perhaps his BBC handlers, have used the cheap trick to sell their wares, and this is not appreciated.
If Howard Falcon-Lang did not a) claim to be a science reporter and b) have a dumb-ass hyphenated name, I'd be nice in my critique of his recent writeup. But no. He left me no choice. I will have to take it apart red in tooth and claw.
Charles Darwin may have been wrong when he argued that competition was the major driving force of evolution.
OK, this is a little premature for me to say here, but as you read on you'll see that my assertion is justified: Mr. Falcon-Lang is not really in a position to make any kind of claim regarding the wrongness or rightness of a genius of the level of Dr. Darwin.
He imagined a world in which organisms battled for supremacy and only the fittest survived.
No. That is the world that so many hack science writers, creationists, and various Darwin detractors imagine. Darwin wrote endlessly about differential survival, differential reproduction, mate selection, and all the myriad forces that determine selection (and randomness). He did not imagine the thing Mr. Falcon-Lang imagines him to have imagined.
But new research identifies the availability of "living space", rather than competition, as being of key importance for evolution.
Never start a sentence, let alone a paragraph, with the word "but" especially when the rest of the essay is something one has essentially pulled out of one's "butt."
... continue reading
Tweet
RELATED CONTENT
Stephen Cave - Financial Times Comments
What we really know about our evolutionary past – and what we don’t
Magic at Every Age A review of Richard...
Stacy L. Memering,Viviana A.... Comments
Magic at Every Age
A review of Richard Dawkins, The Magic of Reality: How We Know What’s Really True
The Magic of Reality by Richard Dawkins
Oliver Kamm - The Times Comments
Review of The Magic of Reality
Dear believers: Blasphemy is good for...
John Gray - The Globe and Mail Comments
A review of The Future of Blasphemy Speaking of the Sacred in an Age of Human Rights
by Austin Dacey
How the Blind Watchmaker Made Eyes
Donald Prothero - eSkeptic Comments
How the Blind Watchmaker Made Eyes
South Carolina’s Secular Crusader
Laura Paull - Tablet Comments
In a new memoir, Herb Silverman recounts his legal battle against a state ban on atheists seeking public office
MORE BY GREG LADEN
Update 9-March - Kony details via Boing...
Greg Laden - Greg Laden's Blog 46 Comments
Update 9-March - Kony details via Boing Boing
Greg Laden - Greg Laden's Blog 19 Comments
Let the War on Christmas Begin. Atheist...
Greg Laden - Greg Laden's Blog 79 Comments



















Comments
Comment RSS Feed
Please sign in or register to comment
View Comments Page