This site is not maintained. Click here for the new website of Richard Dawkins.

UPDATED: Beyond New Atheism?

UPDATE: Caspar Melville has posted a blog about the reaction to his article. You can read it here.

I'm bored by New Atheism. It's time we move on and leave the years of irascible, impatient, blunt, godless discourse behind

Today I have been defending New Atheism in the morning, and will be attacking it in the evening. At 9am, I debated the Christian theologian Alister McGrath, author of the wittily titled Dawkins Delusion and critic of New Atheism, on Christian Premier Radio. You can bet I swotted up on my Dawkins and Hitchens for that. But at 6pm at the Royal Society of the Arts the magazine I edit, New Humanist, will be hosting a debate called "After New Atheism: where next for the God debate" where the panellists – award-winning novelist Marilynne Robinson, conservative philosopher Roger Scruton, historian Jonathan Rée, the whole thing chaired by Laurie Taylor – will be invited to consider how we can move beyond the crude and simplistic perspective on religion popularised by New Atheism.

Does this make me a hypocrite? I'm going to say "no", though I would wouldn't I? The fact that I can both defend and attack it represents my ambivalence about the phenomenon of New Atheism, or more precisely my certainty that New Atheism is very good at some things and bad at others. For the purposes of what follows I use New Atheism as a somewhat baggy but, I think, useful shorthand for the trenchant anti-religion polemics of Richard Dawkins, Christopher Hitchens, Daniel Dennett (though he is more scientific and more polite) and AC Grayling, plus a few others.

Read on

TAGGED: ACCOMMODATIONISM, ATHEISM


RELATED CONTENT

Jon Stewart Doesn’t Understand How...

Sean Carroll - Cosmic Variance -... 48 Comments

Jon Stewart Doesn’t Understand How Science Works Even a Little Bit

Robert Wright promotes...

Jerry Coyne - Why Evolution Is True 204 Comments

Robert Wright promotes accommodationism, disses Dawkins

Republicans insane; want to establish...

Jerry Coyne - Why Evolution Is True 115 Comments

Whither Eagleman?

Sam Harris - SamHarris.org 20 Comments

Part 1 (we hope) of a written exchange between Sam Harris and David Eagleman.

Francis Collins: Atheist Richard...

Michelle A. Vu - ChristianPost.com 340 Comments

I was wrong: BioLogos promotes Jesus,...

Jerry Coyne - Why Evolution Is True 30 Comments

Falk’s new essay on the BioLogos site, “The Crutch,” clearly shows that the main goal of BioLogos is not to convince evangelical Christians that faith and evolution are compatible so that they’ll accept evolution, but so that they don’t reject Jesus.

MORE

MORE BY CASPAR MELVILLE

Petition to defend Indian rationalist...

Caspar Melville - New Humanist 26 Comments

Our friend and colleague Sanal Edamaruku, the President of the Indian Rationalist Association, is facing arrest for exposing a fraudulent ‘miracle’ in a Catholic Church

Face to faith

Caspar Melville - Guardian.co.uk,... 36 Comments

We are not yet in a country which has to protect religious sensitivities at all costs

The real debate about atheism is here...

Caspar Melville - The Guardian 54 Comments

Humanist Feelings

Caspar Melville 27 Comments

MORE

Comments

Comment RSS Feed

Please sign in or register to comment