Is this the right GP for the drugs advisory council?
By EVAN HARRIS - GUARDIAN.CO.UK
Added: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 09:05:28 UTC
Thanks to billzfantazy for the link
There is only one GP on the Home Office's Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs (ACMD). Until last month Dr Margaret Birtwistle served on the ACMD. She is a GP consultant to Surrey Drug Action Team and a forensic medicine examiner. Last week, the Home Office appointed Dr Hans-Christian Raabe, a Manchester GP who does not appear, as far as I can see, to have published any relevant peer-reviewed research.
So it appeared that the Home Office was not able to recruit attract any specialist GPs and thus appointed an inner-city GP. But Raabe is not just a GP. He is a leading member of the Maranatha Community, a Manchester-based evangelical Christian group.
He is also the joint "medical co-ordinator" of the Council for Health and Wholeness (CHW), a group based in the office of the Maranatha Community. Both the Maranatha Community and the CHW have strong views on drugs and homosexuality and regularly send briefing materials to MPs and policymakers.
Raabe has co-authored an article that claims: "While the majority of homosexuals are not involved in paedophilia, it is of grave concern that there is a disproportionately greater number of homosexuals among paedophiles and an overlap between the gay movement and the movement to make paedophilia acceptable."
He becomes the only member of the ACMD to declare a political interest, in that he has been a candidate for the Christian party in the European elections. Reporter Mark Easton in his BBC blog cites examples of his extreme hostility to harm reduction, which is a fundamental part of the way this country's healthcare and education professionals seek to safeguard the welfare of young people and drug users. These are not mainstream scientific views.
I would say that the problem with Raabe, in respect of his appointment, is not that he appears to be homophobic, or that his views are offensive. After all, neither homophobia nor offensive views can be a bar to serving on expert advisory committees or to participation in public debates. Nor is it a problem that he is deeply religious. There are plenty of religious people in advisory groups and engaging in policy discussions, some of them making valuable contributions. The problem is that the ACMD is an expert committee where even those members with strong policy views have them framed in the context of their experience in the field, or their scholarship, and not merely their opinions and beliefs.
Read on [Original article also contains several links, not reproduced here]
Chris Chambers and Petroc Sumner -... Comments
Science has an uneasy relationship with journalism, so what can be done by both sides to improve coverage
Will Self - BBC News Magazine 100 Comments
We chase "fast culture" at our peril - unusual words and difficult art are good for us, says Will Self.
Annie Murphy Paul - New York Times 26 Comments
New support for the value of fiction is arriving from an unexpected quarter: neuroscience.
Nick Cohen - The Spectator 40 Comments
If you turn on the news tonight and hear of a bomber slaughtering civilians anywhere from Nigeria to the London Underground, I can reassure you of one point: the bombers will not be readers of Richard Dawkins.
Amol Rajan - The Independent 39 Comments
Their assault illustrates the extent to which defenders of religion still dominate our press, the brutal retaliation exacted on clever opponents of faith and the incorrigible stupidity of Sayeeda Warsi's claim about "militant secularism" last week.
Richard Dawkins - RichardDawkins.net 341 Comments
I can’t help wondering at the quality of journalism which sees a scoop in attacking a man for what his five-greats grandfather did.