This site is not maintained. Click here for the new website of Richard Dawkins.

How far should we trust health reporting?


If health-risk information in newspapers is routinely misleading, there are real-world consequences

After years of threats, abuse, complaints with forged documentation, crude attempts at blackmail and more, I can tell you that journalists can be quite sensitive about criticism. But there is one valid objection to this column: that I cherry pick the worst examples to write about.

This, of course, is true. When scientific claims are wrong, they're often interestingly wrong. That makes them a good teaching tool to explain how real science works. But there's also a broader worry. People make real-world health-risk behaviour decisions based on information from newspapers, and if that information is routinely misleading, there are real-world consequences.

So how much reporting, overall, is unreliable? To find out, you'd have to take a systematic and unbiased sample – perhaps a whole week's worth of stories – and then check the evidence behind every claim. This would be an enormous job, but a new paper in the journal Public Understanding of Science does exactly that. I'm in a strange position to be writing about it, since the study was my idea, and I'm one of the authors.

Read more

TAGGED: MEDIA, MEDICINE


RELATED CONTENT

Spanish artist faces prison over 'how...

Ben Child - Guardian 37 Comments

Javier Krahe prosecuted for 'offending religious feelings' after 1978 short film was broadcast on Spanish TV

No blood on the carpet. How...

Richard Dawkins - RichardDawkins.net 174 Comments

[Journalists] seem to feel let down when they discover that the real people aren't anything like the way they so relentlessly portray us; as if, since they've gone to the trouble of inventing extravagant caricatures of us, we should at least have the decency to live up to them in real life.
Also in Polish

Q&A: Pell vs Dawkins - April 9, Easter...

David Knox - TV tonight - Australia 141 Comments

On Easter Monday night Q & A will host a two-man debate between Catholic Archbishop of Sydney, Cardinal George Pell and outspoken, British atheist Richard Dawkins.

'Gay cure' group's London bus adverts...

- - BBC Comments

An advertising campaign backed by a Christian group which has been described as anti-gay has been pulled from London buses.

Why Richard Dawkins is still an atheist

Paula Kirby - Washington Post On Faith 108 Comments

[The God Delusion is] absolutely chock-full of things Richard Dawkins really does believe. Which is handy, because it saves everyone the trouble of making them up.

A brutal price still paid for daring to...

Amol Rajan - The Independent 39 Comments

Their assault illustrates the extent to which defenders of religion still dominate our press, the brutal retaliation exacted on clever opponents of faith and the incorrigible stupidity of Sayeeda Warsi's claim about "militant secularism" last week.

MORE

MORE BY BEN GOLDACRE

What eight years of writing the Bad...

Ben Goldacre - guaridan.co.uk 10 Comments

Pulling bad science apart is the best teaching gimmick I know for explaining how good science works

Serious claims belong in a serious...

Ben Goldacre - guardian.co.uk 33 Comments

If you have a serious new claim to make, it should go through scientific publication and peer review before you present it to the media

Battling Bad Science

Ben Goldacre - YouTube -... 26 Comments

How can we corral data to reveal the...

Ben Goldacre - Guardian 7 Comments

Japan quake: "Total, utter, stupid,...

Ben Goldacre - Ben Goldacre's... 45 Comments

Ben Goldacre Talks Bad Science

Ben Goldacre - 3 Quarks Daily 45 Comments

MORE

Comments

Comment RSS Feed

Please sign in or register to comment