The Language Fossils Buried in Every Cell of Your Body
By CARL ZIMMER - DISCOVER MAGAZINE
Added: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 16:46:30 UTC
It is a shame that grammar leaves no fossils behind. Few things have been more important to our evolutionary history than language. Because our ancestors could talk to each other, they became a powerfully cooperative species. In modern society we are so submerged in words—spoken, written, signed, and texted—that they seem inseparable from human identity. And yet we cannot excavate some fossil from an Ethiopian hillside, point to a bone, and declare, “This is where language began.”
Lacking hard evidence, scholars of the past speculated broadly about the origin of language. Some claimed that it started out as cries of pain, which gradually crystallized into distinct words. Others traced it back to music, to the imitation of animal grunts, or to birdsong. In 1866 the Linguistic Society of Paris got so exasperated by these unmoored musings that it banned all communication on the origin of language. Its English counterpart felt the same way. In 1873 the president of the Philological Society of London declared that linguists “shall do more by tracing the historical growth of one single work-a-day tongue, than by filling wastepaper baskets with reams of paper covered with speculations on the origin of all tongues.”
A century passed before linguists had a serious change of heart. The change came as they began to look at the deep structure of language itself. MIT linguist Noam Chomsky asserted that the way children acquire language is so effortless that it must have a biological foundation. Building on this idea, some of his colleagues argued that language is an adaptation shaped by natural selection, just like eyes and wings. If so, it should be possible to find clues about how human language evolved from grunts or gestures by observing the communication of our close primate relatives.
This line of thinking raised an exciting possibility: Perhaps language left a fossil record after all—not in buried bones, but in our DNA. Yet for years biologists could not find a single gene involved in language.
Ten years ago, that finally changed.
- - PhysOrg.com Comments
Using a process called paleo-experimental evolution, Georgia Tech researchers have resurrected a 500-million-year-old gene from bacteria and inserted it into modern-day Escherichia coli (E. coli) bacteria. This bacterium has now been growing for more than 1,000 generations, giving the scientists a front row seat to observe evolution in action. Credit: Georgia Institute of Technology
- - Sense About Science 6 Comments
Welcome to this questions and answer session on cross fertilisation, which has also been called contamination, with Wendy harwood and Huw Jones.
Rothamsted Research - YouTube/Sense... 79 Comments
Add your support to the appeal from scientists at the publicly funded Rothamsted Research: Don't Destroy Our Research.
Edyta Zielinska - TheScientist 7 Comments
Genes shared across species that produce different phenotypes—deafness in humans and directional growth in plants—may reveal new models of disease.
MORE BY CARL ZIMMER
Carl Zimmer - Discover Magazine Blogs Comments
There’s something fascinating about our chromosomes. We have 23 pairs. Chimpanzees and gorillas, our closest living relatives, have 24. If you come to these facts cold, you might think this represented an existential crisis for evolutionary biologists.
Carl Zimmer - iTunes Comments
Science writer Carl Zimmer and evolutionary biologist Douglas Emlen have teamed up to write a textbook intended for biology majors - free app available for the iPad
Carl Zimmer - Discover Magazine Blogs 13 Comments
The human genome contains about 100,000 fragments of endogenous retroviruses, making up about eight percent of all our DNA
Carl Zimmer - The New York Times 19 Comments
The first goal of the project, known as the Open Tree of Life, is to publish a draft by August 2013. For their raw material, the scientists will grab tens of thousands of evolutionary trees that are archived online. They will then graft the smaller trees into a single big one.
Carl Zimmer - The Loom 6 Comments
A Hot Young Earth: My Answer to the
Annual Edge Question