10 Reasons Why We Should Explore The Deep
By CRAIG MCCLAIN AND AL DOVE - DEEP SEA NEWS
Added: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 17:12:56 UTC
Among both scientists and non-scientists there is skepticism about James Cameron’s “Deep Sea Challenge” dive into the Marianas Trench on Sunday and what it really achieved for society. We keep getting asked: why should we do this and what do we get from Cameron going to the deep? Deep-sea exploration is expensive, difficult and dangerous. Why should anyone go, let alone he?
One of our more cynical colleagues on Twitter stated:
“Rich asshole builds his own sub and dives really deep. Yawn. Gullible scios and journos mistake such vanity tourism for important discovery”
And one of us [Dr. M] admits that he was also skeptical of the importance of all of this to begin with, but that was before the exciting events of Sunday evening.
Yesterday, we spoke to some of the reasons why Cameron’s dive was important, while acknowledging that some of these reasons may not be direct scientific gain. And this brings us to the difference between exploration and science. Deep-sea scientists are probably more comfortable moving back and forth between these two fields than most other scientists, given that the vast majority (and we do mean vast) of the deep-sea is unexplored. In other words, deep-sea science is still in its infancy. Exploration is for when we lack anysystematic knowledge about a subject and seek to gather in this most simple fashion. We seek to define the unknown. Pure science, on the other hand, has a more explicit goal of the eventual prediction of pattern and process that arises out of the testing of formal hypotheses. Of course, the two need not be a dichotomy; exploration can be a subset of science. Some take a stricter view in which science is restricted to deductive approaches (theory yielding hypotheses that are tested with observation and experiment). We, on the other hand, feel the inductive approach is a valuable part of science as well (observations eventually emerging into a pattern that yields hypotheses).
Damian Carrington - The Observer 3 Comments
"In the long run, I would still be more concerned about the impact of climate change, but this work shows that even if we stabilise the climate, we might still get sea level rise due to how we use water."
- - BBC News - Science & Environment 6 Comments
An "annular eclipse" will be visible from a 240 to 300km-wide swathe of Earth stretching from Asia across the Pacific to the western US on Monday.
Richard Black - BBC News - Science &... 6 Comments
Scientists have identified thousands of sites in the Arctic where methane that has been stored for many millennia is bubbling into the atmosphere.
Sid Perkins - Science - AAAS.org 8 Comments
Did a comet wipe out woolly mammoths and an ancient Indian culture almost 13,000 years ago? Geologists have fiercely debated the topic since 2007. Now a new study says an extraterrestrial impact wasn't to blame, though the scientists who originally proposed the impact idea still aren't convinced.