This site is not maintained. Click here for the new website of Richard Dawkins.

Just Say Yes…To Sexist Stereotyping?

From the Ms. Editors: Despite doubts about the efficacy of abstinence-only sex education,  U.S. tax dollars are still funding it. Conservatives earmarked $250 million for such programs under the Affordable Care Act, and last month, the Obama administration controversially green-lit the Heritage Keepers abstinence-only curriculum to receive funds reserved for evidence-based sex education. The excerpt below, from Katherine Stewart’s recent book, The Good News Club: The Christian Right’s Stealth Assault on America’s Children, takes a detailed look at the problems posed by abstinence-only education.

Abstinence education posits the idea that the proper way to educate adolescents about sex is to instruct them to refrain from sexual activity until marriage. The way to avoid contracting an STD or an unwanted pregnancy, a typical program tells its students, is follow a few simple rules: “Respect yourself. Choose friends who are positive influences. Go out as a group. Get plenty of rest.” Doug Herman, a popular abstinence-until-marriage speaker at public high schools across the United States, sums up the message this way: “If the sun doesn’t touch it, nobody else’s son ought to be touchin’ it either!”

The typical abstinence program, however, is not against sex per se. Abstinence instructors often make a point of telling teenagers that they know how hard it is to refrain from sexual activity. Sex is wonderful, it is incredible, it is mind-blowing—if you are married. The principal goal of most such programs, in fact, is to imbue childrern with a certain view about the proper relationship between sex and marriage. Sex within marriage is a source of fulfillment and even ecstasy; sex in all other contexts is degrading and shameful.

Abstinence educators frequently promote this view by representing all sex that occurs outside the marital bed as harmful. Premarital sex is dangerous and dirty, they say—a gateway to decadence, depression, broken lives, and an early grave, especially for women. If you have sex outside of marriage, says Pam Stenzel, a nationally recognized “abstinence proponent” who delivers talks to public school students around the country, “then you will pay.”
Read more

TAGGED: DISHONESTY, EDUCATION, RELIGION, SCIENCE, SOCIETY


RELATED CONTENT

German Homeopathy Companies Pay...

Andy Lewis - The Quackometer Comments

German Homeopathy Companies Pay Journalist who Smears UK Academic

Betrayal

Eric MacDonald - Choice in Dying Comments

Betrayal

The Right’s Righteous Frauds

Frank Bruni - The New York Times 29 Comments

The Right’s Righteous Frauds

Family Battle Offers Look Inside Lavish...

Erik Eckholm - The New York Times 47 Comments

Family Battle Offers Look Inside Lavish TV Ministry

Science book delayed when someone...

GrrlScientist - The Guardian 37 Comments


Science book delayed when someone
notices it's written by creationists

MORE

MORE BY KATHERINE STEWART

How Obama's healthcare reform boosted...

Katherine Stewart - The Guardian Comments

How Obama's healthcare reform boosted abstinence-only sex education

Loretta Preska's judicial crusade to...

Katherine Stewart - The Guardian Comments

US Catholic bishops' abuse of...

Katherine Stewart - The Guardian Comments


The US Conference of Catholic Bishops in session in Atlanta, Georgia, earlier this month. Photograph: Tami Chappell/Reuters

[Update] How Christian fundamentalists...

Katherine Stewart - The Guardian 36 Comments

How Christian fundamentalists plan to teach genocide to schoolchildren

Tennessee Goes Monkey Again

Katherine Stewart - RichardDawkins.net 44 Comments

Australia's blurred separation between...

Katherine Stewart - The Guardian 30 Comments

Australia's blurred separation between church and state
Constitutional ambiguity has allowed religion an excessive influence in schools, and Australia is not alone in this respect

MORE

Comments

Comment RSS Feed

Please sign in or register to comment