3 Science Questions to Ask U.S. Presidential Candidates
By BORA ZIVKOVIC - SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN
Added: Thu, 24 May 2012 21:44:34 UTC
As you may already be aware from my previous posts, The Guardian U.S. and NYU’s Studio 20 journalism lab have teamed up to push a project called The Citizens’ Agenda into the media discourse surrounding the U.S. presidential 2012 election. The idea: find out what you–the citizens–want the candidates to be discussing over the next four months – usually meaning questions of substance about policy rather than horserace and gotcha questions so pervasive in mainstream media.
A couple of weeks ago, I posted a call for the Scientific American community to provide us with the three most important science-related questions that they would like to see the candidates asked by the media or during presidential debates in the fall. The Scientific American community is one (actually the first to have this finished) of a number of topical communities providing questions. Naturally, our readers are interested in science, so we are focused on the science topics here.
Our Facebook page post soliciting question received over 120 comments (as well as 104 Likes and 61 Shares). The blog post itself got an additional 18 comments. We asked you “What three science questions do you think the U.S. presidential candidates should answer before we vote on November 6?” and since some comments included multiple questions, we got a grand total of 246 questions!
I am extremely happy with the quality and quantity of the submitted questions. You took this seriously and came up with a number of excellent questions.
An informal scan of the questions leads me to categorize questions by focus. There are: questions that ask for candidates to state science facts; questions that ask candidates’ stances on hot and politicized science issues; questions that ask about the role of science in governing; and fun/silly/provocative questions
There is value in all four types of questions. Each one of them is multi-layered and is actually trying to examine the following:
- are candidates reasonably educated in basic science?
- are candidates well informed about current understanding of various aspects of the world?
- to what extent will candidates apply scientific knowledge and advice by scientists in shaping policy, as opposed to interest groups that may or may not adhere to empirical knowledge in their agendas?
- to what extent will candidate’s style of governing resemble scientific method: observing and studying the world as it really is (as opposed to what one wishes it to be), collecting and analyzing data, and applying best available remedies to the problems?
In short, all the questions are trying to get at this core issue: are the candidates reality-based?
Hugh Kramer - Examiner.com Comments
200,000 pledge to vote for Jesus in 2012
- - We The People Comments
Enforce federal 501(c)(3) regulations by removing the tax-exempt status from churches that engage in political activity.
David Edwards - The Raw Story 15 Comments
Billy Graham’s daughter: ‘I would not vote for an atheist’