This site is not maintained. Click here for the new website of Richard Dawkins.

N. Dakota 'Religious Liberty' Measure Sparks Debate

Next week, North Dakota voters will decide whether to add an amendment to the state's constitution that supporters say will guarantee religious freedom. But the ballot measure has prompted debate over precisely what it safeguards; opponents argue that it's a solution in search of a problem and worry about its consequences.

Measure 3 is worded this way: "Government may not burden a person's or religious organization's religious liberty." Its supporters call it the Religious Liberty Restoration amendment; they say it's needed because of a 22-year-old U.S. Supreme Court decision they believe has put limits on religious freedom.

"What this amendment is attempting to do is to restore that level of protection to what it was pre-1990," says Tom Freier, who heads the North Dakota Family Alliance. The group led the effort to put the measure on the ballot.

Freier says that making Measure 3 part of the constitution would give it permanence and help prevent attacks on religious freedom.

"So, the analogy would be: We live in Fargo, and most recently in Bismarck and in Minot, you've had floods. And you want to prepare for that. You don't know exactly when or how things are going to happen, but you want to make preparation," he says. "This measure would really put in place the protection for North Dakota that would make sure that people are protected, and religious organizations are protected, when and if they do need that protection."

But the measure's opponents worry about unintended consequences. They say it could allow parents who abuse children to hide behind the curtain of religious liberty. One opponent is Tim Hathaway, executive director of Prevent Child Abuse North Dakota.

"We are urging a 'no' vote on Measure 3," he says, "because it will seriously undercut protection for children in our state by opening the door for people to claim religious freedom as a justification for maltreatment."

Renee Stromme of the North Dakota Women's Network agrees, saying if it passes, Measure 3 could also lead to discrimination.

"An employer could use religious beliefs to fire a pregnant woman because she is unmarried," Stromme says. "So let's think that through: We now have a single mother, unemployed, struggling to make ends meet, to care for the welfare of her family — and her employer would have a protected defense for his action. And a judge would have to determine otherwise."

Read more and listen to the story

TAGGED: RELIGION, US POLITICS


RELATED CONTENT

200,000 pledge to vote for Jesus in 2012

Hugh Kramer - Examiner.com Comments

200,000 pledge to vote for Jesus in 2012

Enforce federal 501(c)(3) regulations...

- - We The People Comments

Enforce federal 501(c)(3) regulations by removing the tax-exempt status from churches that engage in political activity.

3 Science Questions to Ask U.S....

Bora Zivkovic - Scientific American 3 Comments

Tennessee Goes Monkey Again

Katherine Stewart - RichardDawkins.net 44 Comments

Scott Walker's Attack on a Woman's...

John Nichols - The Nation 9 Comments

Billy Graham’s daughter: ‘I would not...

David Edwards - The Raw Story 15 Comments

Billy Graham’s daughter: ‘I would not vote for an atheist’

MORE

MORE BY DAVE THOMPSON

MORE

Comments

Comment RSS Feed

Please sign in or register to comment