Impressive and useful. I honestly don't think Robertson deserved the detailed response you gave him, but it is good that you did. I found his most letters almost impossible to read, as I gave up after reading phrases of nonsense.

[Just one very, very minor point. I think we should avoid terms like "Stenger explains that..". Vic Stenger is not a maintream physicist in terms of his views on some matters. We can't pick his views because they provide easy and convenient answers to theist questions, when some matters he seems to suggest are closed are still very much a matter of debate.]

One thing that came across is the sheer unpleasantness of some of the responses. This seems somewhat paradoxical considering what they are supposed to be defending!

These reviews will be an important resource here.