This site is not maintained. Click here for the new website of Richard Dawkins.


← Fleabytes

_J_'s Avatar Jump to comment 5793 by _J_

Yes, I'm sure David would take a different approach to Richard, who would clearly saw through the table argument (for instance) in an instant. But what else does David actually have in the arsenal?

I'm interested. Where would a Robertson/Dawkins discussion go, do you think? Presumably neither party is going to be convinced by the other, so that's two outcomes we can rule out. But where would the debate be likely to end up concentrating? David's concept of evidence? His accusations of outdated logical positivism? If we take an overview of the arguments we've seen fielded by both figures, where do think the front line would fall?

Welcome to Fantasy Richard Dawkins Debates. Gentlepersons, start your speculation.

Wed, 19 Mar 2008 05:09:00 UTC | #138983