This site is not maintained. Click here for the new website of Richard Dawkins.

Comment

← Male circumcision is a weapon in the sperm wars

Agrajag's Avatar Jump to comment 4 by Agrajag

Wilson suggests, however, that the lack of a foreskin could make insertion or ejaculation slower, meaning brief, illicit sex is less likely to come to fruition and lead to a pregnancy.

Ah, but the *non-illicit* sex... :-)

3. Comment #189459 by Crystal on June 6, 2008 at 10:10 am

How would ancient people know about sperm wars to put this together. The crushed testicle would seem odvious to anyone who knows the male part in reproduction...

Those ancient people, what did they know? Crushing testicles when every fool knows sperm comes from the spine!
Ste5e

Fri, 06 Jun 2008 09:14:00 UTC | #179958