This site is not maintained. Click here for the new website of Richard Dawkins.


← WEIT review: Kevin Padian sucks me back into into the religion/science quagmire

Needscowbell's Avatar Jump to comment 2 by Needscowbell

This book review reeks of the "teach the controversy" nonsense. A science book's primary function is to explain the science. Philosophy is a fascinating endeavor, but not required for scientific discussions. Also, last I checked, none of the modern schools of science require a "leap of faith." Science is based on evidence, not faith.

Wed, 01 Apr 2009 10:49:00 UTC | #342564