This site is not maintained. Click here for the new website of Richard Dawkins.

Comment

← Climate Change editorial

bitbutter's Avatar Jump to comment 303 by bitbutter

I agree with Steve Zara's comment that it's not the experts we should be placing our trust in, but the scientific method. At the moment I have doubts about whether the case for AGW is the r
result of proper application of this method.

@scot rafkin:

The details are available in peer reviewed literature. I'm fairly certain (but not positive) that you can download the raw data and process the data following the peer-reviewed procedure, or any other way you'd like.


Would it be possible, do you think, to find out from peer reviewed papers why the particular processing decisions shown in the link below were made?

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/12/11/would-you-like-your-temperature-data-homogenized-or-pasteurized/

(Maybe I will find out otherwise but its not clear to me at the moment that there's adequate accountability built into to the way this data is processed).

Sat, 12 Dec 2009 09:45:00 UTC | #422765