Keddaw you obviously can provide links to actual peer reviewed articles that show climate science being "flawed" right?

To me it seems you have bought into the media spin on climate science. The whole email fiasco is but an attempt to muddy the waters by people with no evidence. Whoever "exposed" the CRU emails only did it to damage the public perception of scientists. To suggest that was a credible expose into the flaws of climate science is absurd.

http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2010/02/the-guardian-disappoints/#more-2808

This article explains how bad journalism has essentially fabricated this "flawed science" you talk about.

The climate email hack is well paralleled with evolution denialism. They never actually produce any real evidence, they just look for ways to discredit or dismantle the scientific consensus. These methods never include any actual research and are only designed to muddy the waters of public perception.