This site is not maintained. Click here for the new website of Richard Dawkins.

Comment

← Richard Dawkins - Absolute Morality

prolibertas's Avatar Jump to comment 30 by prolibertas

@andrewsabatier

No right and wrong, just what's better and worse toward a particular goal? The latter sounds like 'right and wrong' to me, and if the goal is increasing well-being, then it's a moral right and wrong. This isn't post-moral, it's moral realism.

P.S- Please don't anybody bother to ask why increasing well-being should be the goal of morality. That question is too stupid for words.

Sat, 01 May 2010 20:16:00 UTC | #464689