This site is not maintained. Click here for the new website of Richard Dawkins.

Comment

← Ken Ham vs. Rev. Barry Lynn Over Tax Funded Bible Theme Park

yanquetino's Avatar Jump to comment 18 by yanquetino

Comment 10 by Riley :

Ken Ham in this case is right. The government needs to be neutral. If a Mickey Mouse based theme park would have qualified for government subsidies as part of a state program intended to attract tourism and business development (i.e. tax revenue and jobs), then so too should a Noah's Ark based theme park.

Wow... I didn't know that Disneyworld was attempting to proselytize the religious belief that Mickey Mouse was real!

The government should be neutral about reality? Can't wait for them to subsidize a Golden Plate theme park for Mormons.

Sun, 30 Jan 2011 03:25:28 UTC | #585823