This site is not maintained. Click here for the new website of Richard Dawkins.


← Dealing with William Lane Craig

Pecksniff's Avatar Jump to comment 54 by Pecksniff

The problem atheists have is that they are sensible and relucatant (correctly so) to state unknowns as fact.

WLC is the complete opposite. He's a good debater, but his arguments are poor and unconvincing. I'm sure he could put forward an excellent defence of the existence of the Loch Ness Monster by using his limited amount of arguments.

Plus, Craig is usually in front of an audience who want to accept his worthless arguments as solid evidence for their own beliefs.

Tue, 05 Apr 2011 21:44:37 UTC | #612329