RDFRS US:
The mission of the Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science is to support scientific education, critical thinking and evidence-based understanding of the natural world in the quest to overcome religious fundamentalism, superstition, intolerance and suffering.
The Magic of Reality
for the iPad
Sean Faircloth:
Attack of the Theocrats!
The moderators have made it very clear (in another thread) that they have a low tolerance for “capitalism-bashing”, so perhaps a low whisper of a response will suffice in this case (psssttt… I agree with you).
As a young single man in college, I learned rather quickly that handing in quality work on schedule was the sure-fire path to success. Many years later, much to my chagrin, I learned that this educational model was too simplistic to adequately describe the world of business. A short list of the main complicating factors follows:
As a student, I could do “all-nighters” to complete critical assignments that were due. If I was a single father and had an ill young daughter at home, very few things could motivate me to offload that responsibility onto someone else.
This post is already straying precipitously into the realm of capitalism-bashing, so I will end with my (still largely unsupported) conclusion that “nuclear household family life” in America is essentially at odds with the time-critical goals of corporate America. I’ll also offer up the somewhat radical (and unrealistically utopian) proposition that if everyone was effectively “single”, and if the responsibility of raising a child was off-loaded from the “parents” and placed squarely into the domain of long-term boarding schools filled with enlightened and brilliant professors like Richard Dawkins, then men and women would be free to “give their all” to business endeavors of great scientific importance like the James Webb Space Telescope. Of course, then this eliminates the need for single-family housing tracts and suburban neighborhoods and the automobile industry and, and, and...
Phew! See how I came back ‘round to the topic at the end? Nice, huh?
(Major caveat: I'm a man. The experience a woman has in raising a child is mostly foreign to me, genetically and otherwise. It isn't my place or intention to rank corporate business endeavors over the mother-child relationship. Most corporate endeavors are an utter waste of time IMO, but then we're right back to capitalism-bashing, aren't we...)
Permalink Wed, 27 Jul 2011 18:41:27 UTC | #854753