This site is not maintained. Click here for the new website of Richard Dawkins.


← Why the laws of physics make anthropogenic climate change undeniable

Alan4discussion's Avatar Jump to comment 12 by Alan4discussion

Comment 10 by Jos Gibbons

That's funny. All the ones I've encountered have “a science qualification”, like our friend rolan (see below). Now, I suppose they could all be lying, but it's much more charitable to think you and I have experienced very different critics of modern climatology's findings, and that the reason they never say what science the qualification is in is because “half a dozen of one, six of the other”.

I was talking about the public at large, rather than the minority with science qualifications. Your point about qualifications in the wrong subjects (having diverted study away from relevant ones) is a good point. I have a friend who is a denier, who has a PhD in chemical engineering. He is also the retired manager of a coking plant, so will have been studying literature from the coal industry, - probably to the exclusion of other subjects.

It is important to know one's limitations and recognise the limitations of others. You will see that I usually leave the physics to the consensus of physicists, although as a biologist, I am well aware of the effects of global warming, a changing climate, and the bio-mechanisms they trigger.

Tue, 30 Aug 2011 09:42:34 UTC | #865491