This site is not maintained. Click here for the new website of Richard Dawkins.


← Why the laws of physics make anthropogenic climate change undeniable

jbyrd's Avatar Jump to comment 45 by jbyrd

Comment 43 by NealOKelly :

Comment 42 by jbyrd

Calling them deniers is quite appropriate, since they are in fact denying a mountain of evidence as well as the facts of the situation. It is not an insult to call a spade a spade.

You make out like there are only 2 possible views about ACC! Either you believe in it, or you don't.

That's nonsense! On might:

  • not believe the climate is changing at all

  • believe that it is changing, but human influence has had no effect

  • believe that humans have had an effect, but not a big one

  • believe that the majority of global warming is down to man

  • believe [as Jos appears to] that 100% of global warming is not only down to man, but specifically down to CO2 emissions

  • accept that global warmining is man made, but that believe the consequences might not be that bad

  • accept that global warmining is man made and believe the consequences will be catastrophic

  • believe the only way to deal with the consequences is to cut CO2 emissions,

  • believe that reductions in CO2 emissions will take decades to show any effect and that we better off concentrating on adapting developing technology to cope with a changed climate. Whilst 98% of climate scientist may support the proposition that climate change is man-made, it's absolutely not true to say they argree on all of the above.

  • That's not a made up controversy. It simply isn't. Climate change goes beyond science. It's ecomonics, it's politics. It most certainly not black and white!

    That is merely political propaganda to prevent action....its sickening tbh.

    Wed, 31 Aug 2011 19:58:09 UTC | #865992