This site is not maintained. Click here for the new website of Richard Dawkins.


← Freud and psycho-analysis: still useful?

Red Dog's Avatar Jump to comment 8 by Red Dog

It would be greatly appreciated if any experts out there could present some conclusive papers, or make their case in layman's terms.

A good starting point would be the works of Karl Popper on Philosophy of Science and the need for a theory to be falsifiable. Here is a short paper I found online by him on the topic, its just an introduction though.

Mon, 31 Oct 2011 14:47:43 UTC | #885730