RDFRS US:
The mission of the Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science is to support scientific education, critical thinking and evidence-based understanding of the natural world in the quest to overcome religious fundamentalism, superstition, intolerance and suffering.
The Magic of Reality
for the iPad
Sean Faircloth:
Attack of the Theocrats!
Perhaps they feel so tired of parts of current culture that they want to reject it in some more radical way? Not only not taking part in it, but also in a way displaying a middle finger to it? Sometimes being against something can be enough to bond people together.
Also, I guess if you wanted to opt out of consumer culture, people around you would often ask you why you are acting different. You might be alone in what you do. 40 years ago, these women would perhaps have become communists and lived in a collective. Now religion offers a reason you can give to people.
If you are not part of some ideological system, you may have doubts and feel anxious about your choice; "what's the point of my little demonstration, maybe I should just join consumer society again". But in a religious (or political) movement you have people around you telling you that you are doing the right thing.
I read in a book about cults (think it was Steven Hassans "Combating Cult Mind Control") that cults sometimes bring people in through "love-bombing", where new recruits get a lot of positive attention. This feels great and may be a new experience to many. But after a while, this positive treatment becomes conditional on following the rules and doing things for the cult. Just like with a drug, you want that love-bombing again, and you will go to great lengths to get it. Maybe a bit like in behaviorism experiments...
Permalink Sun, 06 Nov 2011 21:26:40 UTC | #887983