This site is not maintained. Click here for the new website of Richard Dawkins.


← Yet another flea

Starcrash's Avatar Jump to comment 10 by Starcrash

I understand they want to make a play on words with the title, but if it was true that we didn't see something that was there, would that still be a delusion? At least's Richard's title made sense.

While I'm sure it's helpful to their side that they see "inner contradictions" in our arguments, it still doesn't prove God. Let's not forget who has the burden of proof in this case. All of our arguments could have logical fallacies, and it still wouldn't matter if they can't prove God with unfallacious evidence of their own.

Wed, 30 Nov 2011 01:59:40 UTC | #894273