This site is not maintained. Click here for the new website of Richard Dawkins.


← Colbert explains how to deal with Internet censorship protests

potteryshard's Avatar Jump to comment 15 by potteryshard

I've alway thought it ridiculous for patent to be good for 17 years and a copyright good for life plus 70. All intelectuall property should have similar protective times. What would be wrong with a 17 year copyright? Arguably, the invention probably cost more to create and would justify a longer payback time.

Sat, 21 Jan 2012 00:16:08 UTC | #910370