This site is not maintained. Click here for the new website of Richard Dawkins.


← More rubbish about "shrill" atheists - this time in The Daily Mail

mlgatheist's Avatar Jump to comment 28 by mlgatheist

Blockquote The narrow and rather meaningless argument to which Dawkins confines himself is the incessant charge that there is no "evidence" for God

Is a math instructor being incessant when he/she continues to state that 2 + 2 = 4? Is a biology teacher being incessant when he/she states that colds and flus caused by viruses? Then why say that Professor Dawkins being accused of being incessant when he states the fact that there is no evidence for the existance of any god?

When any of us say there is no evidence for Vishnu or Thor does this person claim that we are being incessant?

Tue, 31 Jan 2012 21:08:10 UTC | #913202