RDFRS US:
The mission of the Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science is to support scientific education, critical thinking and evidence-based understanding of the natural world in the quest to overcome religious fundamentalism, superstition, intolerance and suffering.
The Magic of Reality
for the iPad
Sean Faircloth:
Attack of the Theocrats!
zengardeners's thoughtful point by point post above prompted me to consider the challenges myself.
Of course not. They've not been taught to read so the written word is a useless form of communication. However, after tuition, they can communicate with humans with sign language. Can you communicate with sign language? I can't.
Certainly. They can let us know when they're hungry, bored, tired.
Homocentric view. Do you enjoy ape mating rituals? Also, I don't enjoy Shakespeare.
See reflecting on existence.
Homocentric view. Do you enjoy ape grooming rituals? They can certainly appreciate music - studies show it can be soothing or agitating to apes. Much like humans. Besides, you're lumping apes here in the same category as teenagers.
As was amusingly pointed out above, neither does half of America. Nor does a three year old.
They do. Those that have learnt sign language have not only reported on their dreams, but also recognise that they are dreams.
Again, they do. And they know when they've done wrong.
Homocentric view. Can you determine your status in a pack by decoding the complex clues relating to heirarchy? Also, read Köhler.
They're certainly aware of differences in scale, which is all this is.
They can certainly form superstitions; a certain coloured food tray is bad, another one good. Also, given that no human has ever given a coherent definition of god I hardly think we can berate apes for this.
Permalink Sun, 18 Mar 2012 15:19:37 UTC | #928334