This site is not maintained. Click here for the new website of Richard Dawkins.

Comment

← Rhode Island cross controversy - legitimate or petty?

Mark Jones's Avatar Jump to comment 308 by Mark Jones

Comment 301 by Peanuts

I would suggest that that itself was a misrepresentation of my own comments that it was written in response to. I never suggested - and do not believe - that posting on an internet forum in support of secularism is in itself intolerant.

OK, well in the spirit of charity I'll accept that what I said is ambiguous and the above is how you interpreted it; mea culpa, I'll clarify a little. Your posts don't suggest that 'posting on an internet forum in support of secularism is in itself intolerant'. Your posts are suggesting that the people posting here, on this thread, in support of secularism are being intolerant.

The rest of your comment is unrelated to the rest of my post, so you have still not addressed the points I made, which I won't repeat.

Wed, 09 May 2012 00:11:04 UTC | #940639