RDFRS US:
The mission of the Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science is to support scientific education, critical thinking and evidence-based understanding of the natural world in the quest to overcome religious fundamentalism, superstition, intolerance and suffering.
The Magic of Reality
for the iPad
Sean Faircloth:
Attack of the Theocrats!
Comment 16 by ColdThinker
Why would you ban anything that is consentual? Would you outlaw suicide generally or just in the case of religious folk's doing it?
Does an 'private' individual have the right to refuse access to his house on a freezing cold night?
Refused by whom? On whom? Are the rights of a third party being infringed?
Yes, but only in cases where a person has his/her rights infringed by other citizens; otherwise govt.'s function should be to ensure the maximum amount of freedom possible.
But the writer of the article obviously thinks that liberty is a good thing.
Only where the rights of third parties are involved.
Physical violence should be an no-no. You'd have to elaborate on whiat you mean by 'mental violence'.
Just another brief point: the writer says that, "In a democratic society, in principle governed by reason,...." Since when does democracy have anything to do with the 'reason' of its citizens?! All democracy means is that each person's vote is of equal value to the vote of every other person, in relation to the issues to be decided by citizens, e.g. electing one's local MP or Senator. The 'reason' behind each person's decision to vote the way he does has nothing to do with democracy; frankly, it's nobody's business.
Permalink Tue, 29 May 2012 11:17:11 UTC | #944202