RDFRS US:
The mission of the Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science is to support scientific education, critical thinking and evidence-based understanding of the natural world in the quest to overcome religious fundamentalism, superstition, intolerance and suffering.
The Magic of Reality
for the iPad
Sean Faircloth:
Attack of the Theocrats!
This might be counter to the prevailing views here, but my response to the rhetorical question in the headline "Does religious liberty equal freedom to discriminate?" is a qualified 'yes.'
The American tradition of religious liberty includes a deep deference to the internal practices of religious groups. If a denomination like Roman Catholicism discriminates against women, and on the basis of marital status, when deciding whom to allow to become a priest, I think that is okay--and so does American law. A religious exemption for communion wine was allowed during the days of prohibition. If a denomination wants to bar openly gay clergy, or wants to bar same-sex marriage ceremonies from their churches, that is also within their rights under the "free exercise" of religion clause.
So yes, religious liberty does include a LIMITED freedom to discriminate.
But it is not a blanket right to discriminate. Other comments have covered the situations where religious liberty should and/or must defer to secular custom and law.
Permalink Thu, 31 May 2012 21:57:31 UTC | #944854