RDFRS US:
The mission of the Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and Science is to support scientific education, critical thinking and evidence-based understanding of the natural world in the quest to overcome religious fundamentalism, superstition, intolerance and suffering.
The Magic of Reality
for the iPad
Sean Faircloth:
Attack of the Theocrats!
I think a compulsary GCSE in RE is pretty repugnant. And I went to a school where RE (previously RI, Religious Instruction) was compulsary.
Pretty patchy it was too. The ones that were most useful were by my history teacher. I'm guessing she was a believer but never made it explicit. "Remember the Bible is not a history book!". And put four columns on the board for Mathew, Mark, Luke and John and pointed out the contradictions and inconsistencies (in other words treated like an historical document).
Actual specialists in RE. Who on earth in the mid-20s wants to teach RE to uninterested teenagers? We were set an essay where we imaging how we could help other people (I can't remember if the "other people" was made explicit) if we won a large sum of money (say 10,000 UKP). Some subversive (maybe me) got the amount upped and we proceeeded to compete on the most profligate (and unhelpful) way to spend the money.
The headmaster "I can teach anything". RE was just like any other lesson he taught. Anecdotes from his past "when I was the director of a football team" or, his favourite, the 4 (or 5 or 12 or whatever it was) routes into an engineering career. I suspect he single handedly destroyed britain as an engineering nation.
So RE can be quite a broad subject. None of that wishy-washy comparitive religion though. "it just confuses them".
Permalink Sat, 09 Jun 2012 10:04:27 UTC | #946541