This site is not maintained. Click here for the new website of Richard Dawkins.


← The raw deal of determinism and reductionism

Steve Zara's Avatar Jump to comment 251 by Steve Zara

comment 249 by Schrodinger's Cat

Nobody is better qualified to comment on the nature of my actual conscious experience itself than I am.

Seeing as you have not been able to give a single reason why we should accept what you say, not a single reason as to how this physical/non-physical aspect of consciousness should result in anything physical, such as your words, then you can provide no justification at all for that statement.

This is yet another example of attempting to show you are true by assertion.

What we see here is equivalent to theology: after so many thousands of words insisting that something must be the case but refusing to provide any evidence for it, then the fact that you continue to argue without evidence is itself evidence for that what you say is not true.

If you had anything to offer, you would have surely done so. You haven't.

Sun, 22 Jul 2012 15:09:35 UTC | #949837