This site is not maintained. Click here for the new website of Richard Dawkins.


← Para-naturalistic theories cannot lead to practical engineering

voxu's Avatar Jump to comment 22 by voxu

reply to blue water

Forget repeatability because the world doesn't always work that way, each perception is a data point and you have to work with that.

"Forget it" I think not. I choose to believe that EVERY SINGLE TIME I (or anyone for that matter) strike a lit match (in the presence of enough Oxygen) to gasoline that it will, understandably, burst into flame. That is how my world works. I can be forgiven for the oversimplification I hope, but I'd like to see (perceive, to use your terminology) the "data point" in which that fails to be true. I can certainly "perceive" of a condition where it fails, but that's my over-active imagination. Repeatable experiment, drawing the same conclusion is the basis of the scientific method, when testing any theory, no?

Mon, 13 Aug 2012 19:51:02 UTC | #950755