This site is not maintained. Click here for the new website of Richard Dawkins.

Badger3k's Profile

Badger3k's Avatar Joined over 7 years ago
Gender: Male

Latest Discussions Started by Badger3k

More Discussions by Badger3k

Latest Comments by Badger3k

Go to: Warning: A Truckload of Stupid

Badger3k's Avatar Jump to comment 38 by Badger3k

I thought Dawkins was a biologist, not a philosopher. As for Maher, he's one of those who claim that to be an atheist, you have to claim to know 100% certain that there is no god. So he calls himself an agnostic. His use of the terms "agnostic" and "atheist" jibe with common thought, but not with what most atheists I know of actually use. I get the idea that he wants doesn't want the negatives attached to the word atheist. At least I'm glad he hasn't used "freethinker" - with his anti-vax and conspiracy lunacy (positive on the first, IIRC on the second), he is far from a rationalist.

Mon, 15 Dec 2008 20:18:00 UTC | #287659

Go to: New Rules for Sarah Palin and Her Witchdoctor

Badger3k's Avatar Jump to comment 19 by Badger3k

Maher is not really too knowledgeable about a lot of things. His confusion of atheism with what is more or less a "strong atheistic" position of denial rather than lack of belief is one part. His anti-vax lunacy is another. I think there are more crazy beliefs he has, but I am not sure, so I'll stop with the two that I am aware of.

Sun, 05 Oct 2008 13:11:00 UTC | #246971

Go to: Logical Proof of the Existence of a Divine Creator, Why Atheism is Not Logically Sound

Badger3k's Avatar Jump to comment 348 by Badger3k

Re: #74 (I think) - I have had a dyson for about a month and have no loss of suckage. The thing would make a great creationist (sorry, not meant to insult the fine Dyson machine or its makers).

Over at the Atheist Experience blog ( there is some evidence that this fellow is involved in some pretty reprehensible (and some laughable) actions. You got to read it to get an idea of how unhinged this is. He even mentions this thread as part of the evil, disreputable, insulting actions against him by us evil atheists.

Fri, 13 Jun 2008 17:33:00 UTC | #183020

Go to: Logical Proof of the Existence of a Divine Creator, Why Atheism is Not Logically Sound

Badger3k's Avatar Jump to comment 12 by Badger3k

To be honest, as soon as I saw the argument from incredulity as the first, absolutely-most-stunning-fantastic-argument-that-prove-atheists-wrong point, well, I stopped reading. Anyone who thinks that is the best evidence isn't worth the read.


Mon, 09 Jun 2008 07:50:00 UTC | #181031

Go to: Lab agrees to test Shroud of Turin for new theory

Badger3k's Avatar Jump to comment 76 by Badger3k

I pretty much stopped reading when they said it was shown to be a fraud 20 years ago. It was shown to be a fraud by the Catholic Church hundreds of years ago - way back when it first was produced. I think this shroud has been resurrected more than their god.

Wed, 21 May 2008 21:58:00 UTC | #174011

More Comments by Badger3k