This site is not maintained. Click here for the new website of Richard Dawkins.

gruebait's Profile

gruebait's Avatar Joined over 6 years ago
Gender: Male

Latest Discussions Started by gruebait

More Discussions by gruebait

Latest Comments by gruebait

Go to: New RDFRS website info

gruebait's Avatar Jump to comment 26 by gruebait

gravatars -
"it will be automatically used on all of the sites referencing a specific e-mail address"

Ah, another convenience for surfing on the net. Of course, a cynic might note that it adds one more way to connect a single identifier (your email address) with every gravatar-using site you visit, and when, and what you read, without even needing to leave a cookie on the user's machine.

The data miners are insatiable, and they have an endless supply of conveniences on offer, all free!

Sun, 02 May 2010 18:27:00 UTC | #465021

Go to: Two articles on al-Qeda and Terrorism

gruebait's Avatar Jump to comment 9 by gruebait

I sometimes find all that analysis a bit pointless. While it's good to "know thine enemy", I can imagine how much regard a Christian fundy from Texas has for the fact that the Archbishop of Canterbury thinks biblical literalism is silly.

It's the fundy cultist I must be concerned about, not what the mainstream religionist has to say.

Mon, 26 Apr 2010 20:17:00 UTC | #463175

Go to: World, Have Your Say

gruebait's Avatar Jump to comment 6 by gruebait

@ Detlef:
Thank you for the link.

Wed, 14 Apr 2010 18:53:00 UTC | #459468

Go to: Some discussions of the Simon Singh case

gruebait's Avatar Jump to comment 25 by gruebait

I am not going to suggest that Ishtar is in the pay of the BCA. Not me.

I would however recommend Orac's blog, Respectful Insolence, for a "surgeon/scientist"'s take on 'alternative' medicine:

Sat, 03 Apr 2010 21:30:00 UTC | #455671

Go to: 'Stroke of luck' led to life on Earth

gruebait's Avatar Jump to comment 12 by gruebait

Most commenters seem to be assuming that Dawkins' reference to luck or unlikelyhood was applied to the origins of life itself. I thought it referred to the probability of any particular individual's existence.

Fri, 12 Mar 2010 14:38:00 UTC | #448787

More Comments by gruebait