This site is not maintained. Click here for the new website of Richard Dawkins.

Dr Technical's Profile

Dr Technical's Avatar Joined over 7 years ago
Gender: Male

Latest Discussions Started by Dr Technical

More Discussions by Dr Technical

Latest Comments by Dr Technical

Go to: Ricky Gervais and The Archbishop Of Canterbury

Dr Technical's Avatar Jump to comment 19 by Dr Technical

Hitchens would destroy him.

Tue, 14 Oct 2008 13:13:00 UTC | #250963

Go to: Ricky Gervais and The Archbishop Of Canterbury

Dr Technical's Avatar Jump to comment 16 by Dr Technical

I have no respect at all for Rowan Williams, he is clearly deluded and the head of delusional society.

As for intelligence, well if my kids can understand "the who created God ?" question and he can't, well that sounds pretty thick to me.

Any one who is the head of a death cult that seeks to perpetuate its lies by indoctrinating children is a pretty odious person in my mind.

Oh, and if he was THAT worried about world debt and poverty, he could sell all the church's assets and help them that way.

I'm sorry, but the bloke is a grade A berk.

Tue, 14 Oct 2008 12:47:00 UTC | #250951

Go to: Prickly fish add genetic heft to Darwin's theory on its 150th anniversary

Dr Technical's Avatar Jump to comment 3 by Dr Technical

Religionists seem to be proud of the fact that it's OK to ignore evidence. What annoys me is that they don't even try to understand, and wallow in glorious smug ignorance.

It is indeed a biological enigma.

Sat, 30 Aug 2008 15:45:00 UTC | #227216

Go to: Plan to exhume cardinal is 'homophobic'

Dr Technical's Avatar Jump to comment 38 by Dr Technical

a) Comment #237224 was an excuse to be homophobic. Not clever or even remotely funny.

b) He's dead, he cares not

c) As God does not exist, is religious desecration possible ?

d) I wonder if the South African's prayed before today's cricket match against England ;-) (irrelevant to the thread, but hey, what a thrashing !)

Tue, 26 Aug 2008 10:14:00 UTC | #224631

Go to: Council ban on atheist websites

Dr Technical's Avatar Jump to comment 57 by Dr Technical

Re comments 47,49, come on guys, give me some credit, I do understand the point of the original article. Note the ";-)"

We all know that banning atheist sites and not religious sites is plain bonkers.

People always moan about the criteria used when blocking web sites; my point is you are on slightly shaky ground saying you should be allowed to see atheist web sites at work.

Yes the council's policy is discriminatory, but the council workers shouldn't be looking at any non-work related sites, so we shouldn't argue that they should be allowed to look at atheist web sites, we should argue that they should block religious ones too.

Get on with some work, you lazy loafers, especially the retard who spends his life maintaining the block list rather than doing something useful ;-)

Tue, 29 Jul 2008 12:56:00 UTC | #209810

More Comments by Dr Technical