This site is not maintained. Click here for the new website of Richard Dawkins.

DarwinsPitbull's Profile

DarwinsPitbull's Avatar Joined about 7 years ago
Gender: Male

Latest Discussions Started by DarwinsPitbull

More Discussions by DarwinsPitbull

Latest Comments by DarwinsPitbull

Go to: Apologists for evil

DarwinsPitbull's Avatar Jump to comment 445 by DarwinsPitbull

With that cartch-all, simplistic and ill-considered diatribe, I can really see why you are a fan of Condell.
I wouldn't have expected anything less of you.

I am a fan of his because he goes straight to the point and doesn't worry about offending anyone. I agreed with this video because I know exactly the kind of people he is talking about. There is a difference between someone who considers themselves liberal just because their friends or family are liberals and the people who actually understand liberalism. The same goes for conservatives too. But I think he described the real liberals perfectly. They are more worried about making sure we are liked then they are about the consequences that their soft, lets all holds hands mentality brings. These liberals also don't really believe the crap they say. For example, take affirmative action. This is something that most liberals say is a good things and we need more of. But can anyone name me a liberal who has ever stepped down from their job willing so that a minority can have their job? It's even funny that here is the USA we have a conservative news channel, Foxnews, and a liberal channel, MSNBC, and the conservative channel has more minorities than the liberal one. But they have no problem labeling someone a racist if they say they are against affirmative action, illegal immigration or think that islamofascist are a real threat.

Sun, 02 Aug 2009 21:28:00 UTC | #384440

Go to: Apologists for evil

DarwinsPitbull's Avatar Jump to comment 356 by DarwinsPitbull

Another great video by Pat. It's very true that the liberal left is always ready to call someone a racist or bigot for stating facts but never realize how ignorant and stupid some of the things they say are. For example, here in the USA all you heard from the left is how this Sotomayor supreme court pick should make all hispanics proud. But why? I am "hispanic" but I am not Puerto Rican. Is the left saying that there is no difference between a mexican, puerto rican, columbian, cuban or Costa Rican? We are all just hispanics so I guess we should all feel proud to have her nominated but this never works the other way. DO italians feel proud to have an irish person nominated? NO. They would say "I don't care, I am not Irish". But I can even count the number of times I read in the paper, or saw on TV some liberal saying that anyone who is against Sotomayor is against hispanics and that republicans should tread lightly because they might piss off all hispanics. This is how stupid and ignorant the left is. If they knew anything about the people or culture of people from latin countries they would know that we are all different and that some people from certain latin countries dont like other people from other latin countries. But they don't care, they just like to put us into little groups and make us victims. But I love running into a liberal and saying "I am against illegal immigration", they then proceed to call me a racist but then shut the hell up when I tell them I am "hispanic". Suddenly they don't know what to say. You take away a liberals emotional arguments and they have nothing left.

Sun, 02 Aug 2009 00:04:00 UTC | #384129

Go to: Believe Me, It's Torture

DarwinsPitbull's Avatar Jump to comment 261 by DarwinsPitbull

Styrer Comment #370084

Listen, I'm done. You can consider it a victory for yourself if you like because I really don't care. Your posts are filled with emotional rants, dumb threats and ad-homs, which aren't that good. I have repeatedly stated the point I was trying to make and you repeatedly ignored it. I get it, you don't like torture and anyone who disagrees is a dick, needs to grow up, or is just dumb. The only thing I do know for sure is that out of the two of us, I am the only one that has read the memos and has been following this story. You just need to get over the fact that valuable information was gathered using these techniques and you can not changed that. You just are going to have to learn to live with it. Don't worry though, I think you'll survive.

Sun, 26 Apr 2009 00:32:00 UTC | #353483

Go to: Believe Me, It's Torture

DarwinsPitbull's Avatar Jump to comment 258 by DarwinsPitbull


You are a bullshit artist.

The very quote you provided indicated that IT WAS NOT CERTAIN THAT TORTURE HAD GOT THE INFORMATION which you, in your wankiness, asserted was indeed achieved by torture. You provided no evidence for your assertion.

Ok last time. They got information using those techniques. There is no arguing the FACT that valuable information was gained. Now you seem to be hung up on this notion that maybe this information could of been gained using other methods, which maybe it could have, but then again maybe it couldn't have been attained using other methods. Either way, we got information using these methods so you can not say that these techniques don't attain any valuable information. We clearly have evidence that it did. Now you can argue that it was wrong to get information using those techniques, but not that it doesn't yield any useful information at all.

So, you say, the evidence was the quote, and some other evidence is a plane NOT flying into an LA building. Hmm.

Yes evidence that those techniques helped us get valuable information was in the quote because the quote said that high valuable information was attained using those techniques. Now here is where you say "but that information could of been attained using other methods". And once again, maybe it could of and maybe it couldn't of, either way, we got valuable info using those techniques.

As for the plot to attack LA, look up the memo released dated May 30, 2005 that says that enhanced interrogations used on Khalid Sheik Mohammed caused him to reveal info that allowed the U.S. government to thwart a planned attack on L. A..

Play on here (I'll be the first to try to protect you from any 'Troll buttoning' here) and try to make sense. You're no fun at the moment, because you are talking so much shit. Shake a leg, man.

Thanks for defending me against something only you seem to think I am doing. How courageous of you.

Sat, 25 Apr 2009 23:38:00 UTC | #353475

Go to: Believe Me, It's Torture

DarwinsPitbull's Avatar Jump to comment 255 by DarwinsPitbull


1) What the hell are you talking about? I used that quote to show that these enhanced interrogation techniques have yielded results. I then also quoted the part where he said maybe we could of gotten this intel using other methods. Either way it proves that these techniques worked. So it does not counter anything because my point was that these techniques worked and that's what the freaking quote said.

2) The evidence was the quote. Other evidence includes that a plane did not fly into a building in L.A.. Other evidence includes that the CIA learned more of the structure of the al-queda network. Also, I will be able to provide more evidence if Obama releases all the memo's and not just the ones that help him politically.

3) Start drinking decaf.

4) No need to end you ridiculous posts with your name because it already appears at the top of the post. You are not writing love letters here.

Sat, 25 Apr 2009 21:13:00 UTC | #353463

More Comments by DarwinsPitbull