This site is not maintained. Click here for the new website of Richard Dawkins.

multifarious's Profile

multifarious's Avatar Joined over 4 years ago
Gender: Male

Latest Discussions Started by multifarious

More Discussions by multifarious

Latest Comments by multifarious

Go to: Pope 'could cancel UK visit' over 'offensive' Foreign Office memo

multifarious's Avatar Jump to comment 18 by multifarious

I understand the CIA has no problem at all picking people from the safety of their laws and ship them off to either clandestine prisons or large open-air interrogation camps. Maybe the MI5 can take some clues there. Then it doesn't matter whether they play the insult-card or not.

I mean, it can be argued there's some structural terrorizing of the most tender going on. Doesn't that make them terrorists and in the run for some involuntary relocation?

Sun, 25 Apr 2010 19:10:00 UTC | #462763

Go to: Ministers apologise for insult to Pope

multifarious's Avatar Jump to comment 61 by multifarious

"You don't invite someone to your country and then disrespect them in this way."

No, you invite children into your house and respect them by raping them. Then you respect thier parents by pressing them into silence. And you can then respect unsuspecting people in other parts of the world by shipping the raping priests to them. Oh, oh, and then you respect the secular authorities, which allow you to practise your delusions, by keeping them out of the loop alltogether.

Thát is how "respect" is done.

Sun, 25 Apr 2010 09:59:00 UTC | #462581

Go to: Islamic scholar Tahir ul-Qadri issues terrorism fatwa

multifarious's Avatar Jump to comment 18 by multifarious

I agree with alabasterocean. And there's another reason for this to work over arguing against their religion as a whole:
I think if you are convinced to the point of blowing yourself and others up for the sake of some perceived assignment from your deity, any argument against said deity will be perceived as a threat, an acknowledgement of their right. In that case they should first be lured into moderation before they will be able to even consider other options.
So either you do this, you talk in THEIR language or you shoot them... And since this kind of literature is more apt at finding those terrorists then our combined intelligence agencies seem to be I'm all for trying to talk them out first...

Tue, 02 Mar 2010 15:30:00 UTC | #445889

Go to: After Americans Visit, Uganda Weighs Death for Gays

multifarious's Avatar Jump to comment 46 by multifarious

Now the three Americans are finding themselves on the defensive, saying they had no intention of helping stoke the kind of anger that could lead to what came next: a bill to impose a death sentence for homosexual behavior.


Ooh.. wait.. I've seen that behavior before.. now where was this.. Oh, yeah: "Ich habe es nicht gewuBt" (I had no idea..). Apparently the reaction of Ze Germans (after WOII) when confronted with the concentration camps.

Who do they think they're fooling? Because to me this is a right slap-in-the-face-of-my-intelligence. Anyone who thinks they can get away with shit like that in this, the internet era, should have their head examined. And the "Sapience" part of their species-designation revoked, since it's supposed to stand for "wise" and "of good judgement".

Why do these people persist in proving Christopher Hitchens right?

Mon, 04 Jan 2010 22:50:00 UTC | #428527

More Comments by multifarious