This site is not maintained. Click here for the new website of Richard Dawkins.

Comments by Alex Malecki

Go to: 2007, a bad year for God squadders

Alex Malecki's Avatar Jump to comment 5 by Alex Malecki

Wow, what convoluted, cliched nonsense.

Thu, 20 Dec 2007 15:08:00 UTC | #96924

Go to: This Is Not a Test

Alex Malecki's Avatar Jump to comment 4 by Alex Malecki

Brilliant as always, Christopher.

Gymnopedie, you too hit it on the head. "He's no theocrat, he just wants a theocracy!"

Mon, 17 Dec 2007 14:55:00 UTC | #95219

Go to: Response to My Fellow 'Atheists'

Alex Malecki's Avatar Jump to comment 5 by Alex Malecki

As articulate and clear as Harris usually is with his words, and as he is in this particular speech, I'm amazed that it has so easily been misunderstood. He is arguing against using the term Atheist as some extra leg on which an argument could stand. He is arguing against using our non-belief as some kind of political trump card the way religious organizations use their belief trump card to say whatever it is that pops into their mind and to justify all their arguments. Good reasons and rationality should always be top priority.

Mon, 08 Oct 2007 12:25:00 UTC | #73453

Go to: CNN Request for 'I-Reports' on religion

Alex Malecki's Avatar Jump to comment 5 by Alex Malecki

I wrote:

Religion is certainly under attack in modern society, and this is fortunate for all humankind living now, and those who will live in the future. Science and reason are corrosive entities that wash away the human impulse to believe in the cosmic significance of our species. In reality, every being that has ever walked this planet has been but a chemical reaction inside a grain of salt in the vast cosmic ocean. How wonderful it is to have such a tool as science to deflate our ego inflated misconceptions.

Wed, 22 Aug 2007 12:56:00 UTC | #61605

Go to: Sean Hannity with Christopher Hitchens

Alex Malecki's Avatar Jump to comment 19 by Alex Malecki

Hannity is a demagogue, who quite clearly, as Hitchens pointed out, hasn't read any of the argument against his position.

Mon, 09 Jul 2007 05:00:00 UTC | #51722